Hiuen Tsiang's description of Sri Lanka
by S. Dhammika
Between the years 629 and 645 AD the famous Chinese monk Hiuen Tsiang travelled through Central Asia and India to visit Buddhist sacred places, learn from Indian teachers and to collect copies of Buddhist scriptures. On his return to China his extraordinary journey made him famous and the Emperor himself asked him to write an account of his adventures. The result was a book called ‘A Record of the West Compiled During the Tang Dynasty' (Ta Tang Si Yu Ki). The ancient Chinese called India ‘the West' because they thought it lay in that direction from their country.
Later Hiuen Tsiang's disciple Hwui Li wrote a biography of his beloved teacher in which was included some supplementary information that Hiuen Tsiang had given him. Together these two books tell us a lot about the most famous Chinese monk of ancient times. To undertake such a long journey, alone, with neither money, knowledge of the language or even a clear idea of where India was, must have required immense courage and commitment. At the same time Hiuen Tsiang's own words give the impression that he was something of a prig, certain of his own importance and very sectarian in outlook.
More than once we see him oblivious to the fact that his pride and arguementiveness are irritating others. However, it is not biographical data that makes A Record of the West and the biography so interesting and important but the detailed information they gives about that lands that Hiuen Tsiang travelled through, in particular India. Hiuen Tsiang was not just a brave traveller and fine scholar, he was also a careful observer, curious about and interested in all he saw.
His book tells the historian more about India - its legends and customs, art and architecture, the literature of Buddhism, the location of famous monasteries, how many monks resided in each and what school they adhered to, the politics, religion and every day life of the people - than any single document until modern times. And this information is not just extensive it is also quite accurate.
For the most part, despite all his sectarian biases, Hiuen Tsiang simply recorded what he was told and what he himself saw. This of course is well known and few are books on ancient India that do not have at least one or two quotes from Hiuen Tsiang. It is less well known that the books contain a great deal of information about Sri Lanka as well. As a source of facts about ancient Sri Lanka Hiuen Tsiang's travelogue and biography have probably been neglected because he did not actually visit the island. But making up for this, the Chinese pilgrim spoke to people who had been there and met many Sri Lankan monks staying in India.
Even while still in north India Huien Tsiang heard a lot about Sri Lanka. When he was in Bodh Gaya he saw the famous Mahabodhi Vihara which had been built by King Megavana. His impressions of the Sri Lankan monks at Bodh Gaya was thus. "The monks of this monastery number more than a thousand...They carefully observe the Dhamma Vinaya and their conduct is pure and correct". The details he gives about the founding of this monastery are too well known to be repeated here.
However, another Buddhist establishment that he visited and which had also been built by a Sri Lankan king is less well known. Concurring this place he wrote,
This is the story Huien Tsiang heard about this temple's founding.
While parts of this story are obviously legendary it seems likely that the building of this temple would not have been attributed to a foreign monarch had it not been so. Several other sources mention Sri Lankan kings constructing buildings in India (e.g. Nissankamalla) and we know that the Mahayana Bodhisattva Avalokitesvara was widely worshipped in the island at one time. Huien Tisang's travelogue gives further confirmation to both these facts.
He got some more information, not about Sri Lanka, but about the famous Sri Lankan - Aryadeva. After Nagarjuna himself his disciple Aryadeva was one of the greatest thinkers of the Madhyamika and perhaps one of the most brilliant and subtle thinkers ever. As with other personalities from ancient India almost nothing is known about Aryadeva.
For example, there is a wide variety of opinions between both ancient and modern scholars about where he was born. Some sources say he was of the royal house of Sri Lanka while others contradict this. But Huien Tsiang very clearly says he was a Sri Lankan. "At a certain time there was a bodhisattva from the island of Simhala called Deva (i.e., Aryadeva) who profoundly understood the relationship of truth and the nature of all composite things. Moved by compassion at the ignorance of men he came to this country to guide and direct the people in the right way."
As this was the story circulating in the 7th century, only five hundred years after Aryadeva's death, it is most likely to be true. And if it is, it shows that while Indians like Mahinda, Buddhaghosa, Dhammapala and Ramachandra Bharati were able to have a profound influence on Sri Lankan Buddhism, Sri Lankans were able to have equally profound effects on Indian Buddhism.
After a long stay at Nalanda Huien Tsiang continued his journey east and then south with the intention of going to Sri Lanka. He had decided on the usual route from North India, to embark on a ship at Tamrilipti and sail down the east coast of India, a trip of about fourteen days. However, a South Indian monk he met and who was presumably acquainted with the way, advised him otherwise.
From this we learn that while the sea route from northern India to Sri Lanka might have been quicker some thought it so dangerous that they preferred to go overland. Certainly Hiuen Tsiang was convinced of this because he decided to take the monks advice. On his way south he passed through the coastal city of Charitra in Orissa, which he described as "a rendezvous of merchants". Apparently these merchants brought back with them tales and stories about Simhala, the legendary and wondrous island to the south and other exotic places. The red lights that could be seen in the evening sky of the coast of Charitra were explained in this way.
When Hiuen Tsiang got to Kanchipuram (southwest of Madras) a party of three hundred monks from Sri Lanka had just arrived in the city. He seems to have had plenty of time to get to know them because he had a long philosophical discussion with some and later travelled through the Tamil country with seventy others. Most of what Huien Tsiang recorded about Sri Lanka he would have learned from these monks and, while some of it must be factual, some must likewise reflect the biases and preoccupations of his informants.
The names of one of the leaders of these monks, Abhayadanshtra, suggest that he and his fellows were from the Abhayagiri. If they were, Hiuen Tsiang would have been able to speak to them without need of an interpreter because he was proficient in Sanskrit and this language a was also widely used in the Abhayagiri.
The monks told Hiuen Tsiang that they had decided to come to India on pilgrimage at that particular time because of trouble at home following the death of the king. He was told that "...the present king, a Chola, is strongly attached to the religion of the heretics and does not honour the teachings of the Buddha; he is cruel and tyrannical and opposes all that is good".
A little later he recorded, "During the last ten years or so the country has been in confusion and there has been no established ruler... " It was this information that made Hiuen Tsiang give up his idea of going to Sri Lanka.
Although this trouble must have been happening between about 600 - 642 AD the Mahavamsa and other Sri Lankan chronicles make no mention of a Chola king around this time or even of a period of social or political turmoil. This suggests that for some periods, the Mahavamsa records only the barest details and neglects to mention others completely.
Hiuen Tsiang learned that Sri Lanka was known by several different names - Ratnadipa "because of the precious gems found there", Silangiri and the Sorrowless Kingdom, which may be related to Ravana's Asoka Garden as mentioned in the Ramayana. Another name, Simhala, was derived from the name of the legendary founder and first king of the island.
Hiuen Tsiang was told two stories about the origins of the Sinhalese, each different from the other and both differing from the legend in the Mahavarnsa. The stories are too long to relate here but they suggest that the Mahavarnsa story was only one of several legends circulating in the 7th century. Hiuen Tsiang described the Sinhalese and their island home thus;
He adds further, " ...they have square chins and high foreheads, they are naturally fierce and impetuous and cruelly savage without hesitation". This unpleasant side of their natures was, he was told, due to being the descendants of the offspring of a a woman and a lion. But this had a positive side as well for it also made them brave and courageous at the same time.
The Sri Lankan monks Huien Tsiang met in Kanchipuram were probably from Anuradhapura which would explain why they were able to give him such a detailed and vivid description of the temples in the capital, especially those in the royal compound. The most celebrated of these was of course the Temple of the Tooth.
It is interesting to note that a few decades after Hiuen Tsiang returned to his homeland another Chinese pilgrim in India, I Tsiang, heard a most strange story about one of his fellow countrymen staying in Sri Lanka.
It seems the Chinese monk was in Anuradhapura and had been invited to attend the washing ceremony at the Temple of the Tooth. So enthralled was he by the tooth that he decided to steal it. Unbeknown to him though the relic casket was attached to some kind of mechanical device so that when it was moved it set off an alarm and automatically sealed all the doors. The Chinese monk was caught and escaped punishment only because of his yellow robe.
Next to the Temple of the Tooth was "a small temple which is also ornamented with every kind of precious stone. In it is a life sized golden statue of the Buddha cast by a former king of the country. He afterwards ornamented the statues head dress with a precious gem". Apparently the statue had a slightly bent head and a delightful legend was told to explain this.
Once a robber decided to steal the gem in the head dress of the Buddha in the temple which he entered by digging a tunnel. Seeing the huge gem he reached up to take it but the statue miraculously increased in height so that he could not reach it. The robber said to himself; "Formerly when the Tathagata was a bodhisattva so great was his compassion that he vowed to give up everything, even his own life, for the sake of others. But now the statue which stands in his place begrudges to give up even one little gem. What was said of old about the Buddha seems to differ from what his statue now dose".
Suddenly the statue bent over and the robber could reach the gem. He ran from the temple and took the gem to a merchant to sell but the merchant recognised the gem, informed the king and the robber was arrested. When asked by the king where he got the gem from the robber said that the Buddha had given it to him and he related what had happened.
The sceptical king sent someone to the temple and sure enough the golden statue's head was still bent over. Convinced that a miracle had occurred, the king brought the gem from the robber, who escaped punishment, and it was placed once again the statue's head dress. Neither this temple or the delightful legend told about its golden statue survive in any Sri Lankan sources.
Another building in the royal compound that Hiuen Tsiang was told about was the Mahapali Hall.
When Fa Hien was in Anuradhapura in 412 AD he received alms in this very kitchen and left a description of it. The great stone trough (bathoruwa) of the Mahasali from which the rice was served can still be seen in the citadel at Anuradhapura.
The rest of the information that Huien Tsiang gives about Sri Lanka consists of brief and fragmentary facts and impressions. For example he mentions that there were a hundred monasteries in the island and about 10,000 monks. About the pearl industry he wrote,
This may be a reference to the religious ceremonies used to keep sharks away from pearl divers that Marco Polo noted.
He also makes a brief reference to Śrī Pada. "In the south-east corner of the country is Mount Lanka. Its high crags and valleys are occupied by spirits that come and go. It was here that the Tathagata formerly delivered the Lankavatara Sutra".
Śrī Pada is of course in the southwest, not the southeast of the island, so either Hiuen Tsiang misheard his informants or lost his notes and later when writing his travelogue had to rely on his (in this case faulty) memory. The Lankavatara Sutra he refers to is the great Mahayana scripture now used and revered in the Zen school of Buddhism of Japan and was supposedly taught by the Buddha during one of his visits to Sri Lanka.
Hiuen Tsiang knew that Mahinda had introduced Buddhism into Sri Lanka although, in accordance with Mahayana tradition, he called him the brother, not the son, of King Asoka. He made an extremely interesting comment about a monastery that he noticed a few miles from the capital of Malakuta in south India.
So it seems that the Buddhists of south India had there own traditions and legends about Mahinda and even monuments attributed to him.
Sri Lankan legend has Mahinda flying from North India to Sri Lanka but obviously he must have come overland. In which case it is only logical to assume that he had done missionary work in South India before coming to Sri Lanka and Hiuen Tsiang's travelogue seems to strengthen this conjecture.
It is a great pity that political trouble prevented the most observant and articulate of the great Chinese pilgrims from visiting Sri Lanka. What other fascinating and detailed information about our past would we have if he had he do been able to?
Courtesy: The Island of 21 October 2000